Marlboro College President Ellen McCulloch-Lovell’s Keynote to the 2012 VBSR Conference

Marlboro College President Ellen McCulloch-Lovell delivered the opening keynote at yesterday’s annual conference in Burlington of Vermont Businesses for Social Responsibility (VBSR).  Topics Ellen addressed included the importance in Vermont of the non-profit sector and the value of a liberal arts education for business and community leaders.

President McCulloch-Lovell spoke to an audience of 350 in the 4th-floor hall of UVM's Davis Center.

 

The full text of her keynote address follows below:

Keynote Address:  Vermont Businesses for Social Responsibility; Ellen McCulloch-Lovell, President, Marlboro College
May 15, 2012

The Circle of Responsibility

I am so pleased to be with you, to learn from you, and to offer ideas about how educational opportunity and economic opportunity can be more intertwined.

First, I want to thank Andrea Cohen for inviting me. I’ve long admired VBSR, the largest of the socially responsible business organizations in all of the states: another “Vermont First” to be proud of. You are notable as an association of opinion leaders who both draw upon and develop the Vermont identity – which is so important, given our proud history, our vaunted individualism within strong communities: the second-smallest but proudest state in the nation.

I want to congratulate Allison Hooper, who was honored with the Terry Ehrich Award last night. Terry was committed to schooling and to civic engagement and I am remembering him today as I talk with you.

VBSR welcomes nonprofit employers to the policy table along with private enterprise — 13% of the membership is from the nonprofit sector. This is crucial, because 18.7% of our state’s domestic product — $4.1 billion in revenue — is generated by the nonprofit sector. Think of healthcare, human services, the arts, environmental and educational organizations: over 2,000 of them with budgets over $100,000 a year. In Windham Co. alone, the top six employers in the county are nonprofits, including Marlboro College, the Brattleboro Retreat, and the Hospital.

Ellen fields a question.

Your membership includes ten colleges, all of whom offer a broad, humanistic education along with the specific skills we believe will allow our students to thrive in their lives. We join VBSR – not just because we want you on our boards of trustees! We join because we see the links between learning and doing, between student development and thriving enterprises that give employed parents the confidence and financial stability to say to their children: you can go to college.

It’s a circle, and a cycle: employers offering rewarding jobs; parents encouraging their children to aspire to education and engaging work; committed and innovative entrepreneurs creating more opportunities.

Our sectors are joined in the most profound ways. In the United States, the greatest predictor of success in school is the child’s family income level. Put bluntly: more affluent children do better than lower-income offspring. In our age of income disparity, think of the implications for our future.

All schools, but now especially colleges and universities, are the keys to this dynamic cycle.

I want you to understand my perspective. Marlboro College is a small, liberal arts institution in Southern VT of under 300 students, with 40 faculty. We teach the subjects that belong in a liberal arts curriculum and we teach students how to think, how to write, how to find creative solutions, how to learn how to learn. Hundreds of them now work in Vermont, where they started businesses –  Red Hen Bakery is one — or are town planners, lawyers, and artists. Our Graduate School in Brattleboro attracts 150 adult learners – two-thirds from Vermont — for programs in management, teaching and technology. They come to improve – or change – their careers and learn in face-to-face residencies and through on line dialog with faculty and other learners.

We are closely linked to VBSR’s mission through our own values, especially through our MBA in Managing for Sustainability, directed by Ralph Meima, who is here today. Responding to the training needs of the large nonprofit sector, we award the Certificate in Nonprofit Management and the Masters in Mission-Driven Organizations, with courses that overlap with the MBA. There are now nearly 350 graduates of our Nonprofit Program working for organizations essential to Vermont’s well-being all over the state: this is how one small college has an impact on one small state.

As I look around this room, it’s fair to say you all represent “mission-driven organizations.” Some of you who are not 501(3)(C)s might even say that right now you are “non-profit”!

With nonprofits comprising 18.7% of Vermont’s economy,  you’d think our political leaders would be debating daily how to sustain this sector. Just as we are asking how Vermont can create the best climate for sustainable business in the nation, we should be asking how to make sure we are the best home for cause-driven organizations.

Our sectors connect in another circle. We nonprofit educators need to prepare the people who will carry out your ideas and make what you invent.  And we need you to support our efforts to promise a rewarding future to our graduates.

In America, we’ve always believed we can innovate our way out of any problem: we will invent the solution, the next patent, the next medical advancement, the next great thing to be manufactured; the best books, movies and software; even the political system that keeps reaching for our ideals and includes young people, people of color, and immigrants. We’ve always believed that we will leave our communities and our world better for our children. Right now we are not doing so well on that promise.

Here are some reasons why keeping our promises to the next generation is so crucial. According to the Vermont Community Foundation’s 2009 report on Postsecondary Education, college graduates earn nearly double what high school graduates earn over their lifetimes: “$2.1 million, contrasted with $1.2 million. College graduates are more likely to be entrepreneurs – starting businesses and creating opportunities for others. And they are more likely to have healthy families, children who perform well in school, and to vote, serve on civic boards, and support the arts.”

Let’s make it more tangible. A year ago, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 4.1% of college graduates were unemployed; but 14.5% with less than a high school education were without jobs. Those with high school diplomas did better, but 9.6% of them were among the unemployed.

In what feels like the fifth year of the Great Recession, there are some signs of optimism – as recent business surveys and Vermont’s relatively low unemployment rate show – but there is also pessimism about whether young people can go to college and whether they will find jobs after gaining a degree.

Why is this so important? I think many of you know the predictions. Help Wanted, the 2010 study by the Georgetown University Center on Education and Workforce, said that by 2018, “ – nearly two-thirds of new openings will require some college education…But by 2018, the post-secondary education system will have produced three million fewer college graduates than demanded by the labor market.”

Occupations are steadily requiring more education. Economists note that “a significant portion of unemployment is resulting not from a lack of openings, but instead from a mismatch between job seekers’ skills and educational attainment levels and the demands of today’s workplace.”

This tells you why President Obama makes education one of his top priorities for America; he’s relating it to our ability to innovate, make things, create jobs, and to bring them back from off-shore to our shores.

In Vermont by 2018, there will be some “100,000 job vacancies from new openings and retirements; remember, we are an aging state. 62% of those of those jobs will require college education, while 33% will require high school diplomas; only 5% will be open to those who dropped out of high school.” (Georgetown University report)

Right now about 43% of Vermont adults have college degrees –  we are considered a highly educated populace. You can see the gap. Of the 25 fastest growing occupations, 19 will require some college education or more: jobs in technology, management, renewable energy, health care and social services, education, the arts and media, and in government.

I’m better at talking about poetry or public policy and don’t want to drown you in numbers. But let’s look at some more.  87% of Vermont students graduated on time in 2011 from high school and, according to the Department of Education, 61% are going to college within 16 months. If they graduate at the same rate as most, using a generous six years to earn a degree; that means some 40% of Vermont students will attain a college credential. Will we be staying up with the job market requirements at that rate?

Education leaders, with business, nonprofit and government leaders must work together to improve what we call the “college aspiration rate.” We know that 92% of Vermont children in middle school see themselves going to college. But somewhere along the way, they lose hope. Nearly one-fifth of high schoolers report they decided as early as ninth grade not to go on. Why aren’t we engaging them and keeping them in school? How can we change their aspirations and fulfill them?

Why are high school students’ college attendance rates so varied in the state? Not surprisingly, 71% who attended South Burlington High School went on; but that rate was 39% in West Rutland. (2009 data, VT Department of Education)

I don’t mean to leave out those who don’t aspire to a college degree or think they can’t afford one. We have a responsibility toward them too; we need good technical training and wages for the jobs of the future. We all see many examples of Vermont ingenuity around us; we see high school graduates running businesses, working at colleges, helping their neighbors, educating their children. And yes, we need the nurses, teachers, and technicians that many of our colleges produce so well.

Vermont institutions of higher education have a 6-year completion rate of 64%. How could it be higher? And of course the big question on all our minds is, how can college be more affordable?

Through relentless media reports, we’re all aware that student debt is now as large as credit card debt. The national average is $25,000 debt when you graduate; in Vermont it’s grown to nearly $24,000. We hear about the price going up faster than the Consumer Price Index; faster at public colleges than at private schools.

The president wants to tie increases in prices to federal aid. At the same time, colleges try to sustain their programs while states slashing budgets are cutting appropriations to higher education. Higher education is responding in three main ways: cutting costs, raising tuition, and asking for contributions. Our institutions are more vulnerable to inflation, having higher percentages of health care costs, fuel oil, and utilities in our budgets. We run physical plants but most of our costs are in personnel – faculty and staff who have some of the highest-quality jobs in Vermont. Highly labor-intensive, we suffer, as economist Will Baumol said, from the “cost disease” – it’s hard to counter increased costs with increased productivity.

You don’t hear enough about the $145 million that Vermont private colleges alone raise each year for financial aid. You don’t hear enough about “Vermont First” program at Champlain College to assist first generation college attendees, or Community College of Vermont’s “Access to Success,” which helps high school students build academic skills for college.

At Marlboro alone, 35% of our budget does to scholarships – that’s revenue we forgo to allow students to attend. 30% of our students are Pell-eligible, and federal Pell grants are now only $5,550 a year. I’ll stop myself, because that’s a whole other speech.

Can we afford not to make an investment in higher education? One thing to remember as we think about the circle of opportunity from education to employment is that our system in the U.S. is amazingly varied. You can attend college for $5,000 a year or $50,000 a year. You can learn one-on-one and on line. You can study philosophy or forensics. You can expand your mind with theory and take it to practice in internships and work-study jobs.

I just presided over Marlboro’s 65th commencement. The seniors know they are entering a difficult economy. The student speaker only half-joked about the apocalypse, as she suggested seniors stock-pile food from the reception. Among last year’s graduates nation-wide, only 56% had found jobs by the spring. But with job growth over the last year, the prospects are brighter for this class.

Looking out over their shining faces, of course I encouraged them. I told them they will have from six to eight jobs in their lifetimes. I quoted an alumna who said “Marlboro grads don’t just take jobs, we create jobs!” I assured them their skills of clear writing, supple thinking, and creative problem-solving will serve them well.

At the other end of the college experience, I talk to prospective students and their parents. They ask me directly: what good is a college degree? I can talk about the fulfillment of studying great literature or great art. I quote Thomas Jefferson declaring that “an educated populace is the guarantor of their own liberty.” But the answer that is most compelling to them comes from you, business leaders.

In 2009, Peter Hart Research Associates asked employers “how should colleges prepare students to succeed in today global economy?” The top skills? The abilities to:

  • think clearly about complex problems
  • write and speak well
  • to work in teams – with people different from yourself
  • analyze a problem and develop workable solutions
  • be creative and innovative in problem solving
  • understand science and technology and how these subjects are used in real-world settings
  • understand the global context in which work is now done
  • apply knowledge and skills in new settings
  • And importantly, employers seek a strong sense of ethics and integrity.

In his 2011 book, New York Times columnist Adam Bryant listed what he learned from interviewing CEOs. The qualities they look for are:

  • passionate curiosity
  • battle-hardened confidence
  • team smarts
  • a simple mind set – meaning the ability to focus and present concisely
  • and, fearlessness.

What they didn’t say is send us more graduates with business degrees. They talked about “qualities” and “competencies.”  That’s what we need to focus on too. College presidents like me want to hear what qualities you think are important.

As we increase our dialog today, I want to add one another objective: “education for innovation.” We Vermonters are resilient; we learned that during the recession and after Irene. We are also innovative; the list of “Vermont firsts” is long – from abolishing slavery in our first Constitution, before we entered the Union as the 14th state – to our visionary environmental protections. Samuel Hopkins from Pittsford received the first U.S. patent for making potash; Emma Willard opened the first women’s school; a singing-master named Morgan developed the famous horse; Samuel Morey invented the paddle-wheel steamer and Thadeus Fairbanks the iron plow and the platform scale. Think of IBM and the silicon memory chips; Orvis and the open reel fly rod; Jake Burton Carpenter and the snow board.

Vermont has nurtured great intellects like philosopher John Dewey, produced famous artists like Julian Scott, welcomed world-renown musicians like Jamie Laredo, Sharon Robinson and Gwyneth Walker. And I’m not forgetting Phish or Grace Potter and the Nocturals!

Whether it’s the next great Vermont product or a better classroom, we’re inventing our future. I want to make sure that the seeds for innovation are sprouting early in our children.

Creativity means allowing the “widest and freest ranging of the human mind” according to Brewster Ghiselin in his book, The Creative Process. But to complete this process, he reminds us that “what is needed is control and direction.” Psychologist Mihaly Czikszentmihalyi, who interviewed innovative individuals for his book, Creativity, defined it as the process of relating previously unrelated elements. Discovery happens when we combine things that haven’t been tried before. Arts education is one way that young people – who are natural artists and scientists – use materials, make discoveries, and acquire the discipline to express their ideas.

But there is evidence that the “No Child Left Behind” law’s emphasis on testing is driving the arts out of the classroom. Although the arts were included in the legislation as a core competency, the tests only measure reading and math. Instructional time for the arts is decreasing as principals and teachers increase time to prepare for testing. This should worry us. The arts not only allow us to understand ourselves and other cultures, we now know they have a profound impact on cognitive skills, test scores, and on staying in school.

Scholar James Catteral of UCLA found that sustained arts involvement brought lower-income children up to the academic performance of their peers from more affluent families. The better-off children can take music and art lessons outside of school; those from poorer families will miss one influential way to learn and to stay in school. We also know that involvement in the arts can keep a disaffected student from dropping out; what happens when that young person at-risk looses her only chance for self-discovery?

We need to work together to educate for the jobs of today but also the jobs of tomorrow, many of which we cannot imagine. We need to think together about those competencies which you employers identify. Today’s students will take jobs; they will also be the ones to create jobs.

Vermonters are both self-reliant and good neighbors; we were out fixing the roads and cleaning up after Irene before anyone from FEMA could arrive. We are already finding some of the ways to tie the circle from learning, to thriving in the economy, to increasing aspirations.

We already know that higher education leaders must work with middle and high schools on preparing students to succeed. Many of us are cooperating on dual enrollment programs. Marlboro College offers a free course for Windham County high school students. What happens in early childhood development right through the school years is crucial and we have a Vermont K-12 Council charged with aligning all the segments of education with special attention to the transition points where we lose students.

We know that young people learn through doing; so many institutions, including my own, are designing courses for “engaged learning” where students are putting what they learn into visible practice, gaining practical skills, working together in teams. VBSR has its own Vermont Internship Program. This concept is important because young people need mentors. More than anything else, they need an adult to look up to who believes in them. That’s an enormous amount of what it means to be “socially responsible” these days.

And we also know that if we aren’t aware of the impact of our actions on the environment, we will have more Irenes and a darker future for those graduates I sent on their way on Sunday.

What can we do? Educators and other employers can work more closely together to define the competencies we need now and in the next 20 years. We can encourage education for innovation, understanding that to imagine the future is to create it.

And if we are to thrive as a state and a democracy, we must support those curious, questioning, articulate, skilled young people we see in our midst. They are our responsibility and our hope.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Building a network starts now: Marlboro and BGI get together in NYC

Yesterday (Friday) evening, a first tentative step was taken to foster career and social networking in the Northeast among graduates of the small number of MBA programs that are deeply and comprehensively committed to sustainability.  Keeping it simple, Marlboro and Bainbridge Graduate Institute organized an informal networking get-together in the lobby bar (Peacock Alley) at the Waldorf=Astoria Hotel on Park Avenue in New York City.

We had altogether ten folks show up, including a BGI alum, a current BGI student, two current Marlboro students, our admissions director Joe, a Marlboro trustee, a current student’s clients from the Blackstone Group, and myself.  Great, stimulating conversations on numerous business and political topics of common interest resulted.  With busy Friday evening schedules, participants came and went in “shifts,” and we were there from 5 pm until after 8.  We have to do this more often!  There’s clearly a latent Northeast network of like-minded MBA program students and grads to develop here, and much to be gained from a united front that explains to the world what it is that truly sets our programs apart.

Photo, from left: Stephanie Milbergs, Donny Khan, Ariel Muller, Joe Heslin, Kathy Hipple (Ralph Meima took the photo)

 

Program Development and Business Planning for Educational Camp

Eunju Halvorsen, MBA candidate, summarizes her capstone project: Dharmalife English Camp Program.

 My capstone project is to develop “The Dharma Life Camp (DLC)” program as a business. DLC is an educational camp program for children in the age of 13 to 15 designed to support the growth and personal development of teens by nurturing their individual personalities, strengths and interests. DLC integrates individual development coaching with the English skills building curriculum of a current English education camp that has been marketed in South Korea for last ten years. This 4-week-camp program would consist of English language class, cultural exposure, wilderness experience, mindfulness practices such as yoga and meditation, and individual coaching.

This capstone project will be focused on the feasibility research for the DLC as a business model. The feasibility research would include the research on the potential market, which is English camp market in South Korea, and on the customers’ needs & behavior. A business plan will be the final product of this project.

Stress and Change Management: a Feasibility Study

Following is the summary for the capstone project by Toivo Halvorsen, MBA candidate. 

 My Capstone project is mainly a feasibility study of a new venture called Life Design. This is a company merging out of the existing company Pepp, a Norwegian consultancy working with stress & change management that has been operational for 15 years. Pepp wants to separate the corporate assignments from the private market clients. Therefore Life Design is currently building a new type of sales organization based on direct sales of self help products that Life Design itself has produced. Will anyone buy the products? Will the new venture be profitable? These are the main questions I will attempt to answer.

   If demand for the self-help products pick up, Life Design might need to further develop their business model in order to really succeed and satisfy their customers. Because only if they manage to really help people, can this new venture become a sustainable business concept!

Jeremy Grantham Discusses Investing, Resource Limitations & Global Warming

Friday December 2, 5:00 – 6:30 p.m.

Jeremy Grantham, founder of GMO, a global investment management firm responsible for over Jeremy Grantham, GMO founder$93 billion in client assets, will speak at Marlboro College Graduate School on  “Irrational Avoidance of the Unpleasant: Perspectives on Investing, Resource Limitations & Global Warming”.

A recent New York Times profile of Grantham says his quarterly letters “command a cult following of readers within and beyond the financial industry, (because they) inspire even the most short-term profit-minded investors to do a little fate-of-the-world-scale thinking.”

Grantham is an impassioned environmentalist who channels his wealth to The Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment, which tries to raise public awareness of environmental issues and to promote collaboration within the environmental movement. He also supports the Metcalf Institute for Marine & Environmental Reporting, which awards the $75,000 Grantham Prize for Excellence in Environmental Journalism.

Grantham has been featured in Forbes, Barron’s and Business Week and is routinely quoted by the financial press. He earned his undergraduate degree from the University of Sheffield (U.K.) and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.

Reading Grantham’s latest quarterly letter, you get a glimpse of his ability to intertwine compelling storytelling with well documented research. He includes a tale of “The Devil and the Farmer” which highlights his interest in soil erosion and sustainable agriculture. Jeremy Grantham’s son, Rupert, who is a MBA candidate in the Marlboro MBA in Managing for Sustainability, is completing his Capstone on “Promoting Sustainable Agriculture“, a project sponsored by the Grantham Foundation.

 

OccupyMBA

Hi Marlboro MBA Community and Friends

Just embarked on a painful, risky, but – I hope – ultimately useful reflection on the state of the conventional MBA paradigm, and how it works. This is naturally undertaken with our own MBA and its ilk juxtaposed. Please help me stay objective! It’s easy to throw stones and to imagine that one throws them from safe ground… How safe is our ground? It feels different, but?

Here’s how today’s OccupyMBA post starts:

“Narcissism, fragmentation, loneliness, and death”
Posted on November 26, 2011
The culture of the Master of Business Administration is the culture of narcissism, fragmentation, loneliness, and death… unless it’s tethered by an active, caring commitment to community, to stakeholders, and to a reverence for the great natural and human systems in which we all live. To say anything less harsh is to succumb to moral passivity, to write yourself a ticket to stand by and not do enough, whatever good you’re doing….”

Visit http://OccupyMBA.com and http://www.occupymba.wordpress.com

Local Biochar Production Model Business Plan

Kathleen Draper, MBA candidate, summarizes her capstone project: Local Biochar Production Model Business Plan.

Biochar is a carbon negative technology that is on the cusp of emerging from research labs to the marketplace.  Currently there are very few business models in the US or elsewhere for biochar production.  My capstone is focused on creating a small scale replicable business model which keeps production and markets local to maximize the carbon negative aspects of the technology.  This will be piloted this in the Finger Lakes region in Western New York upon completion of my capstone.  Initially biochar and biochar blends will be sold to organic gardeners, greenhouses, farmers, turf management and environmental remediation consultants.  In future services to manage organic waste on site will be offered to farmers to minimize transportation, minimize costs and provide on-site education opportunities for farmers in terms of why and how to use biochar while managing waste.

Water Scarcity Framework

Robert Hart, MBA candidate, is developing a Water Scarcity Framework for his capstone project.

The water scarcity framework is for the capstone sponsor, UTC subsidiary Hamilton Sundstrand.  Rob is analyzing the company’s 2015 water strategy, and examining its impact on two facilities in water scarce regions (Sunderland, United Kingdom, and Chennai, India); he will build that analysis into a framework with specific recommendations for water strategy, post 2015.

Promoting Sustainable Agriculture

Rupert Grantham, MBA candidate, summarizes his Capstone project:

Is organic, no-till agriculture economically competitive with conventional agriculture? If so, why isn’t it being adopted at a faster pace? What can the Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment do to promote a transition to sustainable agricultural practices?

Environmental Economist Calls for Urgent Action on Climate Change

Guest blog by Marlboro MBA student Kathy Hipple.

Noted environmental economist Robert Repetto spoke about the increasing risks of climate change at the Marlboro Grad School last Friday. Global emissions of greenhouse gasses increased 6% in 2010, the fastest level in decades. Such an increase indicates that atmospheric concentrations are accelerating, and many believe they are contributing to extreme weather conditions, such as Hurricane Katrina and the recent Tropical Storm Irene.

The only course of action, Repetto argued, is to reduce dependence on fossil fuels by 80-90% over the next 50 years.

Some critics argue that since America’s industrial structure depends on fossil fuels, a move away from this energy system would seriously undermine the economy. Repetto, a Harvard-educated economist, disagrees. He cited several historic examples of significant energy transitions that have taken place in the U.S. Whale oil was replaced by kerosene and gas lanterns in the mid-19th century.  New England’s industrial development was led by mills, built on waterpower. By late 19th century, however, industries had converted to steam power. In 1882, Thomas Edison kicked off the electric age, and by the 1930’s rural electrification had extended electricity throughout the nation. Before the automobile, New York City had over a million horses. Huge new industries were formed by each of these energy transitions.

Repetto, author of America’s Climate Problem: The Way Forward and an advisor to the Marlboro MBA, urged citizens to lobby their political representatives because he believes that individual efforts are insufficient to avert an impending crisis.

According to Repetto, the free market, through a system of cap and trade on carbon, holds the greatest promise of solving the climate change problem. Cap and trade is not new. It has been used successfully in the past, notably under the first President Bush, for the reduction of acid rain-producing emissions. Based on economic analysis, a cap and trade on carbon emissions would allow businesses to solve the problems more effectively than either a carbon tax or regulations.

A carbon tax would also reduce carbon emissions. Such a carbon tax, however, would be difficult to calculate based on a meta-analysis that Repetto conducted. This analysis suggested a five-fold variance in the amount that would be necessary to reduce emissions.  Once a tax is set, raising the amount is difficult.

Regulating carbon emissions will be less effective than either cap and trade or a carbon tax in reducing carbon emissions, argued Repetto. Regulation would take years before it went into effect, including challenges through the court system. The cost of enforcing such regulation is not trivial.

Despite the urgency of climate change, Repetto predicts that U.S. policy on greenhouse gas emissions will not change before the elections. He noted that the U.S. is responsible for most of the greenhouse gas emissions already in the atmosphere, and suggested that other countries are currently doing far more than the United States to combat climate change.

The Chinese, for example, have shut down hundreds of inefficient power plants, and have added national feed-in tariffs for renewable energy. Their automotive fuel efficiency standards are stricter than America’s. Australia has passed a carbon tax. Europe said they will commit to an additional 20% reduction in carbon emissions beyond an earlier target, and will increase to 30% if the U.S. agrees to a similar reduction.

Repetto suggested that reduction of dependence on fossil fuels by 80-90% over the next fifty years is not only possible, based on human history, but will open up huge business and investment opportunities. A new energy transition is already underway, and must be supported and accelerated. The first steps are easy, and include raising energy efficiency.

“We’ve done it before, and we are doing it again,” notes Repetto.  Last year, for example, solar power generation increased 44%. Wind power generation increased 35%. Over the past decade, revenues in solar and wind energy increased from $6.5 billion to $30 billion.